Legal Judgments and Cases on Trans Matters

• Croft v Royal Mail Group Plc [2003] EWCA Civ 1045 (18 July 2003)

  18 Jul, 2003 · employment tribunal sex discrimination  ·

  Share on:

  Segregating trans individuals is not a suitable way to treat trans individuals in the workplace.

  Case number: A1/2002/2092

  Cite as: [2003] EWCA Civ 1045

  
  

  • https://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWCA/Civ/2003/1045.html
  • https://www.casemine.com/judgement/uk/5b46f1fa2c94e0775e7ef4e3

  ---

  Added: 11 Apr, 2023

• Bellinger (FC) (Appellant) v. Bellinger [2003] UKHL 21 (10 April 2003)

  10 Apr, 2003 · art. 12 human rights art. 8 human rights house of lords decision  ·

  Share on:

  Bellinger v. Bellinger (2009) established that the UK was in breach of art. 8 and feeds into the creation of GRA as established by Goodwin v. UK (2002).

  Case number: [2003] UKHL 21

  Cite as: [2003] Fam Law 485, (2003) 72 BMLR 147, [2003] UKHL 21, [2003] ACD 74, [2003] 2 WLR 1174, [2003] 1 FLR 1043, [2003] UKHRR 679, [2003] 2 AC 467, [2003] 2 All ER 593, [2003] 2 FCR 1, [2003] HRLR 22, 14 BHRC 127

  (53) [...] The question is whether non-recognition of gender reassignment for the purposes of marriage is compatible with articles 8 and 12. The answer to this question is clear: it is not compatible. [...]

  
  

  • https://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKHL/2003/21.html

  ---

  Added: 10 Apr, 2023

• CHRISTINE GOODWIN v. THE UNITED KINGDOM - 28957/95 [2002] ECHR 588 (11 July 2002)

  11 Jul, 2002 · art. 12 human rights art. 8 human rights echr gender recognition act  ·

  Share on:

  Goodwin v. UK (2002) established that the UK was in breach of art. 8 and art. 12 of the ECHR, which resulted in the creation of the Gender Recognition Act 2004.

  Case number: 28957/95

  Cite as: [2002] 2 FCR 577, (2002) 35 EHRR 447, [2002] 35 EHRR 447, 35 EHRR 18, [2002] Fam Law 738, [2002] 2 FLR 487, 35 EHRR 447, [2002] IRLR 664, [2002] ECHR 588, 13 BHRC 120, [2002] 35 EHRR 18, (2002) 35 EHRR 18, (2002) 67 BMLR 199

  (53) [...] The question is whether non-recognition of gender reassignment for the purposes of marriage is compatible with articles 8 and 12. The answer to this question is clear: it is not compatible. [...]

  
  

  • http://www.bailii.org/eu/cases/ECHR/2002/588.html

  ---

  Added: 10 Apr, 2023

• PETITION OF FOR WOMEN SCOTLAND LTD FOR JUDICIAL REVIEW OF THE DEFINITION OF "WOMAN" CONTAINED IN THE GENDER REPRESENTATION ON PUBLIC BOARDS (SCOTLAND) ACT 2018 AND DECISIONS OF THE SCOTTISH MINISTERS RELATED THERETO (FIRST) THE LORD ADVOCATE AND (SECOND) THE SCOTTISH MINISTERS AND FOR PUBLIC INTEREST INTERVENTION THE EQUALITY NETWORK (INTERVENOR) [2021] ScotCS CSOH_31 (23 March 2021)

  11 Jul, 2002 · s.7 Equality Act 2010 s.11 Equality Act 2010 gender recognition act  ·

  Share on:

  Now overturned FWS judgment on the term women. This judgment explicitly excluded trans women in scotland from equal opportunity measures related to Gender Representation on Public Boards.

  As a common theme in many anti-trans legal cases, they attempt to argue that equality laws should be used to discriminate against trans individuals.

  Case number: P697/20

  Cite as: [2021] ScotCS CSOH_31, 2021 GWD 12-161, [2021] CSOH 31, 2021 SLT 639

  (24) [...] The final general point was that the exclusion from the reserved matter of equal opportunities contained within L2 related to the inclusion of persons with protected characteristics. It was specifically designed to allow the Scottish Parliament to include various persons rather than to be exclusive.

  
  

  • http://www.bailii.org/scot/cases/ScotCS/2021/2021_CSOH_31.html

  ---

  Added: 10 Apr, 2023

• Corbett v. Corbett (otherwise Ashley): FD 1 Feb 1970

  2 Feb, 1970 · 1 min read  ·

  Share on:

  

  Corbett v Corbett (otherwise Ashley) [1970] Denied trans individuals UK legal recognition of their acquired gender.

  
  Read More

  • /post/uk/cases/ukhc/1970/corbett_v_corbett.pdf
  • /post/uk/cases/ukhc/1970/Corbett-v-Corbett-judgment.pdf

  ---

  Added: 14 Apr, 2023
• • ««
  • «
  • 1
  • 2
  • »
  • »»